A lawsuit filed against OlympusDAO’s co-founders over $20M+ in the DAO’s native tokens could unmask their identities, testing the limits of pseudonymity in DAOs 拆封相機收購

拆封相機收購
Connecticut resident as the supposed identity behind “Apollo,” one of 拆封相機收購olympus’s pseudonymous co-founders.UnmuteWormhole’s W Token Has a 999% Weekly Return; Why VanEck Is Bullish on Ethereum Layer 2s15:12NEAR Launches Multichain Access02:07Three Crypto Predictions in 202400:52Why Injective’s INJ Has Surged 3,000% in 202311:05How Spool Is Aiming to Help Institutions Enter DeFiCoinDesk has not independently verified the identity of the alleged Apollo and has reached out to the individual named in the lawsuit, Daniel Bara, for comment.What is 拆封相機收購olympusDAO?The Ethereum-based 拆封相機收購olympusDAO project has been one of the most talked-about – and most controversial – experiments to enter the world of DeFi in the past year.The project sought to establish its native OHM token as a digital reserve currency through a mix of memes and game theory, but its price famously tanked 95% this past winter.The OHM token now sits at $28 according to CoinMarketCap, down from a $1,300 peak in October.The complainant in the lawsuit filed Thursday, Australia-based investor Jason Liang, says he agreed to promote 拆封相機收購olympusDAO and paid $50,000 in DAI (a U.S. dollar-based stablecoin) in a private funding agreement in exchange for 4 million pOHM, a precursor to OHM. According to an 拆封相機收購olympus Medium post, investors like Liang were later able to mint 1 OHM in exchange for 1 DAI and 1 pOHM.In his suit, Liang alleges that after he started selling some of his 拆封相機收購olympus tokens, the 拆封相機收購olympus team punished him by rendering inoperable the smart contracts enabling him to redeem pOHM for OHM.Liang says the 拆封相機收購olympus team’s ability to meddle with key smart contract functionality undermines claims that the project is decentralized.According to the lawsuit, the 拆封相機收購olympus team also used pseudonymity to protect its members from liability.Liang alleges that a token purchase agreement (TPA) between him and 拆封相機收購olympus stated that money raised in the private funding round would go to a company that didn’t actually exist. With the identities of 拆封相機收購olympus’s founders a secret, the lack of an officially registered company behind the fundraiser was, according to the lawsuit, designed to make it difficult for an investor like Liang to pursue legal action against the project.The suit says Liang’s legal team identified Apollo by doing a reverse lookup on a phone number Apollo used to call Liang. The name behind the phone number matches one that was signed on the token purchase agreement that Liang originally thought was fictitious.In an email to CoinDesk, Joseph B. Evans, an attorney for Liang, said: “There is a completely legal and legitimate way to run a DAO. This isn’t it. It appears that certain organizations still believe they can avoid liability if their founders and promoters hide behind screen names, social media handles and fictitious entities. My client provided much needed start-up capital to 拆封相機收購olympus, and he is entitled to share in its success.”Is 拆封相機收購olympusDAO an ‘honest Ponzi’?When 拆封相機收購olympusDAO was launched last year, the project’s unique bonding and staking mechanics promised staggeringly high returns to investors in the realm of 10,000% annual percentage yield (APY). In order for the system to work, OHM holders were encouraged to interact with 拆封相機收購olympus’s smart contracts according to a set of game theory principles “memefied” by the project’s community.”Hodling,” buying, and staking OHM would theoretically guarantee steady, sky-high returns for the whole community. Selling, like Liang did, was sacrilege.A flock of vocal critics dismissed 拆封相機收購olympusDAO as a Ponzi scheme from its very start, but the DAO still managed to spur an entire “DeFi 2.0” movement – inspiring popular spinoffs like KlimaDAO and WonderlandDAO to jump in with their own high-yield token systems.As 拆封相機收購olympusDAO has grown into one of the most popular projects in decentralized finance, its creators – the pseudonymous “Zeus” and “Apollo” – have remained anonymous (until now, perhaps, in Apollo’s case).Pseudonymity of a project’s core contributors is not uncommon in the world of DAOs, and it has been framed as a way for a decentralized community to preserve meritocracy.Liang’s lawsuit suggests there are other reasons why DAO creators might want to hide their identities, and the filing comes a couple of months after the pseudonymous creator of WonderlandDAO, 拆封相機收購olympusDAO’s largest spinoff, was unmasked as a well-known convicted felon.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.Further reading on pseudonymityWhy CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against DoxxingCrypto’s Challenge: Right-to-Privacy vs. Right-to-KnowYour Right to Anonymity Ends Where Risk to My Money BeginsThe Perils of Crypto’s Pseudonymous EconomyWonderland’s (and DeFi’s) Anonymity ProblemOf Course It’s OK to Out the BAYC Founders 拆封相機收購olympusDAO lawsuit by CoinDesk on ScribdDisclosurePlease note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information has been updated.CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. In November 2023, CoinDesk was acquired by the Bullish group, owner of Bullish, a regulated, digital assets exchange. The Bullish group is majority-ow

▲底片相機能拍出復古質感風格的照片。（示意圖／Photo by VanveenJF on Unsplash）

記者張家瑋／綜合報導

近年來復古當道，從摺疊式掀蓋手機到底片相機，都掀起流行風潮。底片相機除了可以享受剎那瞬間的畫面捕捉，也能有收到沖洗照片時的滿滿驚喜感。Podcast節目《娜你知道嗎》主持人莫娜就來聊聊底片相機的逆勢回歸。

▲點擊收聽Podcast《娜你知道嗎》，搞懂底片相機有多夯。

莫娜分享了近期歌手伍佰老師的專訪，提到自己隨身攜帶的10個必備物品，其中包括他的相機收藏。伍佰老師以小相機和大相機來形容他的相機們，並表示這些相機是他的通行證，無論身在何處，都會攜帶著它們。令人驚訝的是，他擁有多達5台不同型號的理光GR相機，將它們視為珍貴的收藏品。

伍佰老師所擁有GR-1V和GR-1兩款理光底片相機，分別是在90年代和00年代初期所推出，這些相機以其獨特的色彩和質感而聞名，被譽為街拍神機，至今仍然受到大眾喜愛。特別值得一提的是，日本街頭攝影師森山大道的作品，大部分也都是以隨身攜帶的GR21所拍攝。

而隨著底片相機熱潮再起，底片的需求也隨之上升，加上各大廠近年陸續宣布停產和原物料短缺，導致價格持續上漲。舉例來說，一卷「富士業務100」（24張）的價格已達到了270元台幣，這個價格足夠買一張64GB的SD記憶卡，可以存儲上千張照片。

▲莫娜也分享了幾台CP值高的底片相機。（示意圖／取自免費圖庫pixabay）

莫娜也分享了幾台底片相機，像是Kodak柯達的Ektar H35，它具有現代感，被稱為CP值最高的相機之一，非常適合想要節省底片拍攝成本的人，僅需一兩千元即可入手。另一個選擇是拆封相機收購olympus Trip 35底片相機，它於1967年推出，具有濃厚的復古風格。最後一款則是Canon Canonet QL17底片相機，許多玩家視為最值得收藏的旁軸相機之一，它具有快速裝入底片的功能，在自動模式下，鏡頭會自動測光，並且通過觀景窗內的指針顯示光圈值，不過，這款相機更適合有經驗的攝影愛好者。

底片相機的魅力在於它們獨特的風格和拍攝體驗，不僅能夠激發攝影愛好者的靈感，還能帶來很多樂趣和回憶，你手上有底片相機在使用嗎？不如趁著連假時拍一卷，重新感受復古風潮吧。

拆封相機收購 拆封相機收購